Source:
ChatGPT:
Historically, earning rewards at such merchants has been difficult because many only accept PayNow or NETS QR payments. Previous solutions like XNAP and AMEX Pay were discontinued, limiting opportunities for miles collectors. LiquidPay 2.0 initially appeared to solve this problem by allowing users to scan compatible NETS QR codes and pay using linked credit cards.
Transactions reportedly coded under Merchant Category Code (MCC) 5399, which is eligible for bonus rewards on several popular Singapore miles cards. This meant users could potentially earn up to 4 miles per dollar (mpd) on everyday spending at hawker centres and other small merchants.
However, the article contains an important update. Shortly after launch, LiquidPay changed its setup. Wallet top-ups now code as MCC 6540 and incur a 3.5% fee when funded via debit cards. More significantly, credit card payments at QR-code merchants are no longer supported. As a result, the original miles-earning opportunity has effectively been removed.
The article also discusses wallet limits, which currently appear capped at S$5,000 despite references to higher limits that may require future regulatory approval. While some users explored workarounds involving debit card top-ups and reward-earning combinations such as Amaze-linked cards, the economics became much less attractive after the fee increase.
Overall, LiquidPay 2.0 remains a useful QR payment solution, but its value proposition for miles enthusiasts has diminished substantially since the initial launch excitement.
Social Media & Forum Discussions
HardwareZone (Singapore)
The strongest discussion has been on Singapore-focused finance and miles communities.
Common reactions include:
Initial excitement that hawker spending could once again earn 4 mpd.
Users rushing to test NETS QR terminals across food centres and small merchants.
Frustration after reports emerged that credit-card funding was disabled.
Debate over whether the opportunity was always intended or simply a loophole.
Many HardwareZone users compared the situation to previous short-lived opportunities involving XNAP, GrabPay, and AMEX Pay.
On Singapore-focused subreddits such as r/singaporefi and miles-related communities:
Users shared data points about MCC coding.
Discussions centered on whether 3.5% fees justify earning miles.
Most concluded that the updated structure is no longer attractive for mileage accumulation.
Some praised the community's speed in identifying changes within days of launch.
A common sentiment was: "Great while it lasted."
X (Twitter)
Discussion has been relatively niche but active among:
Miles collectors.
Fintech enthusiasts.
Personal finance influencers.
Posts highlighted:
The brief 4 mpd opportunity.
Changes to MCC coding.
Concerns about sustainability for payment providers offering rewards-funded transactions.
Singapore miles and credit-card groups discussed:
Which cards initially worked.
Merchant acceptance experiences.
Whether LiquidPay would further tighten restrictions.
The tone shifted quickly from excitement to caution after the policy changes.
Personal finance creators posted:
Quick tutorials on setting up LiquidPay.
Explanations of NETS QR compatibility.
Updates warning followers that the original rewards opportunity had already been curtailed.
TikTok
Singapore finance TikTok creators generated short videos explaining:
How users could earn miles at hawker stalls.
Why the opportunity disappeared so quickly.
Lessons about acting quickly when payment loopholes emerge.
Many videos attracted strong engagement from younger consumers interested in travel rewards.
Threads
Threads discussions mirrored X and Instagram:
Users debated whether fintech companies can sustainably support reward-generating transactions.
Some speculated that high transaction costs forced LiquidPay to close the loophole rapidly.
Overall Sentiment
The overall sentiment is mixed but largely disappointed. Initial reactions were highly positive because LiquidPay appeared to revive a valuable way to earn miles at hawker centres and QR-only merchants. However, after the introduction of MCC 6540 coding, a 3.5% top-up fee, and the removal of credit-card QR payments, most finance enthusiasts concluded that the opportunity had effectively ended. The episode is now viewed as another example of a promising miles-earning strategy that was quickly closed once it gained widespread attention.








